Engrish Pictures and other Funny Engrish Mistakes in English from around the world.
 

« Previous | Next »

Catching him was hard!



engrish funny god fillet

God fillet

Submitted by: Boozewoozy via Engrish Funny Submissions

Incorrect source or offensive?

Add this to your blog:
(Copy & paste code)

» Glory! 170 Comment

  1. Lawlin' at things noone else ever lawls at like the word moose says:

    Omg, im sry i hve to…. first

    • JohnB says:

      There’s always a choice. And there is no point in calling on God now, since He’s lying there, filleted.

      • Crumpet says:

        Not necessarily. If god was able to take Adam’s rib and make Eve, with Adam none the worse for wear, surely we can produce “fillet of God” and still have enough God left over and then some.

        Could even be an oblique reference to the loaves and fishes…

        • Htom Sirveaux says:

          There was plenty to go around in James Morrow’s “Towing Jehovah”.

          • dr handle says:

            Drat drat drat someone else mentioned that book before me drat drat drat! Well done, though. (Was it wrong of me to giggle at the line “We commend You unto Yourself”?)

      • Roni :D says:

        Win :D ,
        you made my day :D .

    • paws4thot says:

      Moho is a genus of extinct birds in the Hawaiian bird family, Mohoidae, that were endemic to the Hawaiian Islands. Members of the genus are known as ʻŌʻō in the Hawaiian language. Their plumage was generally striking glossy black; some species had yellowish axillary tufts and other black outer feathers. Most of these species became extinct by habitat loss and by extensive hunting because their plumage were used for the creation of precious ʻaʻahu aliʻi (robes) and ʻahu ʻula (capes) for aliʻi (Hawaiian nobility). The Kauaʻi ʻŌʻō was the last species of this genus to become extinct, probably a victim of avian malaria.

      Until recently, the birds in this genus were thought to belong to the family Meliphagidae (honeyeaters) because they looked and acted so similar to members of that family, including many morphological details. A 2008 study argued, on the basis of a phylogenetic analysis of DNA from museum specimens, that the genera Moho and Chaetoptila do not belong to the Meliphagidae but instead belong to a group that includes the waxwings and the Palmchat; they appear especially close to the silky-flycatchers. The authors proposed a family, Mohoidae, for these two extinct genera.

      • Parry137 says:

        “Catching him was hard!”

        THAT’S WHAT SHE SAID!!!

      • Parry137 says:

        There are numerous mathematically equivalent formulations of quantum mechanics. One of the oldest and most commonly used formulations is the transformation theory proposed by Cambridge theoretical physicist Paul Dirac, which unifies and generalizes the two earliest formulations of quantum mechanics, matrix mechanics (invented by Werner Heisenberg[19])[20] and wave mechanics (invented by Erwin Schrödinger[21]).
        In this formulation, the instantaneous state of a quantum system encodes the probabilities of its measurable properties, or “observables”. Examples of observables include energy, position, momentum, and angular momentum. Observables can be either continuous (e.g., the position of a particle) or discrete (e.g., the energy of an electron bound to a hydrogen atom).[22]
        Generally, quantum mechanics does not assign definite values to observables. Instead, it makes predictions using probability distributions; that is, the probability of obtaining possible outcomes from measuring an observable. Oftentimes these results are skewed by many causes, such as dense probability clouds[23] or quantum state nuclear attraction.[24][25] Naturally, these probabilities will depend on the quantum state at the “instant” of the measurement. Hence, uncertainty is involved in the value. There are, however, certain states that are associated with a definite value of a particular observable. These are known as “eigenstates” of the observable (“eigen” can be roughly translated from German as inherent or as a characteristic[26]). In the everyday world, it is natural and intuitive to think of everything (every observable) as being in an eigenstate. Everything appears to have a definite position, a definite momentum, a definite energy, and a definite time of occurrence. However, quantum mechanics does not pinpoint the exact values of a particle for its position and momentum (since they are conjugate pairs) or its energy and time (since they too are conjugate pairs); rather, it only provides a range of probabilities of where that particle might be given its momentum and momentum probability. Therefore, it is helpful to use different words to describe states having uncertain values and states having definite values (eigenstate).
        For example, consider a free particle. In quantum mechanics, there is wave-particle duality so the properties of the particle can be described as the properties of a wave. Therefore, its quantum state can be represented as a wave of arbitrary shape and extending over space as a wave function. The position and momentum of the particle are observables. The Uncertainty Principle states that both the position and the momentum cannot simultaneously be measured with full precision at the same time. However, one can measure the position alone of a moving free particle creating an eigenstate of position with a wavefunction that is very large (a Dirac delta) at a particular position x and zero everywhere else. If one performs a position measurement on such a wavefunction, the result x will be obtained with 100% probability (full certainty). This is called an eigenstate of position (mathematically more precise: a generalized position eigenstate (eigendistribution)). If the particle is in an eigenstate of position then its momentum is completely unknown. On the other hand, if the particle is in an eigenstate of momentum then its position is completely unknown. [27] In an eigenstate of momentum having a plane wave form, it can be shown that the wavelength is equal to h/p, where h is Planck’s constant and p is the momentum of the eigenstate.[28]
        Usually, a system will not be in an eigenstate of the observable we are interested in. However, if one measures the observable, the wavefunction will instantaneously be an eigenstate (or generalized eigenstate) of that observable. This process is known as wavefunction collapse, a debatable process.[29] It involves expanding the system under study to include the measurement device. If one knows the corresponding wave function at the instant before the measurement, one will be able to compute the probability of collapsing into each of the possible eigenstates. For example, the free particle in the previous example will usually have a wavefunction that is a wave packet centered around some mean position x0, neither an eigenstate of position nor of momentum. When one measures the position of the particle, it is impossible to predict with certainty the result.[30] It is probable, but not certain, that it will be near x0, where the amplitude of the wave function is large. After the measurement is performed, having obtained some result x, the wave function collapses into a position eigenstate centered at x.[31]
        Wave functions can change as time progresses. An equation known as the Schrödinger equation describes how wave functions change in time, a role similar to Newton’s second law in classical mechanics. The Schrödinger equation, applied to the aforementioned example of the free particle, predicts that the center of a wave packet will move through space at a constant velocity, like a classical particle with no forces acting on it. However, the wave packet will also spread out as time progresses, which means that the position becomes more uncertain. This also has the effect of turning position eigenstates (which can be thought of as infinitely sharp wave packets) into broadened wave packets that are no longer position eigenstates.[32] Some wave functions produce probability distributions that are constant or independent of time, such as when in a stationary state of constant energy, time drops out of the absolute square of the wave function. Many systems that are treated dynamically in classical mechanics are described by such “static” wave functions. For example, a single electron in an unexcited atom is pictured classically as a particle moving in a circular trajectory around the atomic nucleus, whereas in quantum mechanics it is described by a static, spherically symmetric wavefunction surrounding the nucleus (Fig. 1). (Note that only the lowest angular momentum states, labeled s, are spherically symmetric).[33]
        The time evolution of wave functions is deterministic in the sense that, given a wavefunction at an initial time, it makes a definite prediction of what the wavefunction will be at any later time.[34] During a measurement, the change of the wavefunction into another one is not deterministic, but rather unpredictable, i.e., random. A time-evolution simulation can be seen here.[1]
        The probabilistic nature of quantum mechanics thus stems from the act of measurement. This is one of the most difficult aspects of quantum systems to understand. It was the central topic in the famous Bohr-Einstein debates, in which the two scientists attempted to clarify these fundamental principles by way of thought experiments. In the decades after the formulation of quantum mechanics, the question of what constitutes a “measurement” has been extensively studied. Interpretations of quantum mechanics have been formulated to do away with the concept of “wavefunction collapse”; see, for example, the relative state interpretation. The basic idea is that when a quantum system interacts with a measuring apparatus, their respective wavefunctions become entangled, so that the original quantum system ceases to exist as an independent entity. For details, see the article on measurement in quantum mechanics.[35]

      • EHW says:

        oh you damn blog cloggers are the bane of these sites

  2. Czernobog says:

    Better step back son
    Give the man some filleting space
    You know this might get messy
    God filleter’s on the case

  3. JohnB says:

    I guess the fish symbol used by Christians had more literal truth behind it than I realized.

  4. ShadowSplicer says:

    wow! i guess the comment board has ratings now. sick! :O

  5. King_Mario says:

    inb4 “Holy Fillet!”

  6. bagsc says:

    American fishermen find God. Product of USA, Ocean Caught!

  7. Starsky says:

    Communion wafers will now be replaced with fish sticks.

    Do you like Fish Sticks?

    • JohnB says:

      Communion wafers aren’t exactly hard to beat in the taste department.

      • Anna Rexia says:

        Starsky made a South Park reference, John. Say “fish sticks” repeatedly as fast as you can.

        • JohnB says:

          Sorry, I don’t grok South Park (sorry, it’s just one of those generational things, I think, like hip hop), and all I get when I say “fish sticks” repeatedly fast is gibberish.

          • Droll not Troll says:

            Oh my Kenny! They killed God! You bastards!

            I’m not sure it’s a generational thing, Brother John. I’m 2 or 3 years older than you, and South Park often gives me some good laughs, as well as food for thought. Some could say I’m going through my second childhood, but I haven’t finished with the first one yet.

            • JohnB says:

              I guess too many of the kids I talked to who liked South Park had also liked Beavis & Butthead, which I had given several chances before I gave up on. So what is supposed to happen when you way fish sticks really fast?

  8. Hark, the herring angels sing.

  9. blueJade says:

    God is love, I love fish, fish is God… wait, that’s supposed to be Ray Charles…
    information overload!!

  10. Steve says:

    It’s sacri-licious!

  11. Sign says “Ocean Catch” so the GOD is probably just Neptune or Poseidon.

  12. saywhat says:

    Neptuna Sushi.

  13. UpTheYingYang says:

    Braise The Lord And Pass The Tartar Sauce!!

  14. blueJade says:

    I Would Expect Something Like God Fillet To Cost Much More Than 5.99 lb.
    Wait, Is It Farmed, Or Wild Caught??

    • JohnB says:

      If God did not exist, we would be obliged to farm him.

      • bluejade says:

        There is an absolutely fascinating documentary from the 50’s on voodoo in Haiti. It’s called “Divine Horsemen,” and it explains, to me at least, the relationship between worship and the deity… the deity being created by the need in the culture, and the deity’s obligation to deliver, or lose it’s believers. Apparently, voodoo is very dynamic at creating deities for specific needs.

        • bluejade says:

          I mean “its’.”

          • Dreadful Spelling Sprite says:

            No you didn’t. “Its” with no apostrophe is the proper possessive pronoun. “It’s” is only a contraction for “it is,” and it’s NEVER anything else. “Its’” is a form that does not exist. Mine, hers, his, yours, ours, theirs, its. No apostrophes are ever necessary for showing possession for pronouns. (And apostrophes are RARELY, if ever, used to make plurals!!!)

        • dr handle says:

          The premise of “Small Gods” (by His Pratchettness) in a nutshell. Look what happened to poor old Om – he was reduced to a single person who really believed in him, and was reduced to incarnating as a tortoise.

      • EHW says:

        It takes so long to reply because of school, work and fits of laughter.

  15. Anna Rexia says:

    Where is ur cod nao?

  16. dr handle says:

    Cod save the Queen! (Goodies flashback.)

  17. hannah says:

    This proves it . There was a god , now he’s dead

  18. Chas77 says:

    Would that also be fillet of soul? Or is that when basement kitty buys you off?

  19. Thou cannot serve God and Gammon.

  20. Facepalm!

    Thou cannot serve Cod and Gammon.

  21. baldrick says:

    Bow to the diet deity.

  22. Harry V. says:

    NOOOOOO the horror:

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/asia-pacific/8219427.stm

    If this is really going to work, this site will lose a lot of content.

    • Doctor says:

      One more reason for us to gather ye lolz while ye may…

    • Alice says:

      AW, SH!T!

    • Lawlin' at things noone else ever lawls at like the word moose says:

      NNNNNOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! D:

    • blueJade says:

      Don’t sweat it, you guys. It will be fine, just fine. Remember, you can’t legislate literacy.

    • Droll not Troll says:

      Typical dictatorship thinking. If China was run by capitalists, someone there would have thought up a way to make money from it, as is happening here.
      Now, if some Chinese companies cared to put some really creative Chinglish on their product labels, they may start something really interesting!

    • Crumpet says:

      If it were going to work it would have already – they tried the same blitz prior to the olympics and look where it got them… I recall some pretty funny engrish lawn signs FROM the olympics…

    • JohnB says:

      If the site loses content, that is likely to cause a lot of discontent.

  23. laconejita says:

    Ohh, you are right. What will we do with all this free time.

  24. H1N1 says:

    OH MY COD! That fish was divine!

  25. 5 eagles C.C.C. says:

    hey so who is the head cheese here?

  26. Tom says:

    Thing that pisses me off is that they are all out of god.And if the monotheistic belief system is correct there is no chance for seconds.

  27. dr handle says:

    It’s just occurred to me that this could be someone’s attempt to get back to the Latin mass: In nomine Patri et fillet et spiritus sanctos, amen.

  28. PencilSharpener says:

    This is like Eucharist, fully realized.

    • JohnB says:

      According to Roman Catholic doctrine, the Eucharist is already fully realized, since the bread and wine are “transubstantiated” into the actual body and blood of Christ. It never seemed to me that it tasted what I would expect flesh and blood to taste like, but I can’t say that I ever expected Jesus to taste like fish, either.

      • dr handle says:

        I Can’t Believe It’s Not Jesus. (I’m sure I’ve done that gag before, but I’m going to burn in hell anyway, so why not?)

  29. PencilSharpener says:

    Nietzsche’s Zarathustra was right– God is dead.
    He failed to mention he had been fileted and end up in a supermarket.
    I always knew Nietzsche’s philosophy was suspect.

    • JohnB says:

      All philosophy is suspect. If philosophy worked, then there would be at least two philosophers who came up with the same answers. Since they never agree with one another, why should we believe any of them?

    • EHW says:

      As if it weren’t enough he hung on a cross.

  30. PencilSharpener says:

    Someone stop me! It’s like a bad amateur comedy night, and I’m on stage…

  31. vox says:

    it tastes like chicken

  32. EHW says:

    THANK COD ALMIGHTY! OUR FREE FAT CATCH!

  33. Rachet says:

    Tastes heavenly!

  34. Griff says:

    Damn… I guess Nietzsche was right


Your Left Comment and Hilarity!

 

 

Search

Everyday to get Engrish Email!


EmailSubscribe
Enter your email address:
 

TwitterFollow us
on Twitter »
FacebookBecome a
Facebook fan »
RSSRSS Feed »
  • Heaven of Tags

  • Your Yacks Currently

    bluejade on Young men can be so shall…
    dr handle on Young men can be so shall…
    dr handle on Young men can be so shall…
    bluejade on Lysol for me!
    dr handle on It’s the bestest ev…
    dr handle on It’s the bestest ev…
    dr handle on It’s the bestest ev…
    bluejade on But I thought we were friends…
    bluejade on It’s the bestest ev…
    leila on But I thought we were friends…
  • Populus Posts

  • RSS Cheezburger Network Blog

  • Even More Lulz

  • Who The Heck Runs This Site?

    Remain clam. I am a licensed Asian-American who has spend 14-years lived all over Asia. Please. Just enjoy.